Essays and book reviews on historical and contemporary philosophical and theological topics. Philosophy has historically been the main path for pagan ideas to enter theology. This is because people want to be scientific, that is to have accredited knowledge, and they confused metaphysics with science.
The opposition of philosophy and
theology in contemporary thought.
The attitude of the modern academy toward a Christian philosophy can be illustrated by the account of Thomas Reid’s philosophy by Norman Daniels in his book Thomas Reid’s ‘Inquiry’. As soon as Reid brought the action of God into his philosophical account, by saying that reliability of man’s knowledge of the world is accounted for by God’s having made both to work together, Daniels accuses Reid of departing from philosophy for dogmatism. Similarly Alvin Plantinga’s presidential address to the American Philosophical Association, on “How to be an Antirealist” were met with a curled lip by philosophers of my acquaintance. Such philosophy will admit the field of philosophy of religion, and of inquiry into the existence and nature of God, but only when God is the subject of inquiry, not the explanation for the validity of the inquiry itself. Among Christians there have been different but equally flawed responses. One early form was the double-truth idea, that some things are true in philosophy (seen as science), while different things were true in theology, and these might well contradict. The approach returned in twentieth century in the distinction between the Bible as religiously true, but not scientifically or historically factual. Another response is to split the mind of man. Dooyeweerd considered man himself to be stretched across the supratemporal and the cosmic, and his reason only worked in the cosmic, while his religious self only knew intuitively. Van Tillians apply this division to knowledge, but without the theosophical explanation, but simply denouncing as rationalists those who do not accept it.
Essays and book reviews on historical and contemporary philosophical and theological topics. Philosophy has historically been the main path for pagan ideas to enter theology. This is because people want to be scientific, that is to have accredited knowledge, and they confused metaphysics with science.
The opposition of philosophy and theology
in contemporary thought.
The attitude of the modern academy toward a Christian philosophy can be illustrated by the account of Thomas Reid’s philosophy by Norman Daniels in his book Thomas Reid’s ‘Inquiry’. As soon as Reid brought the action of God into his philosophical account, by saying that reliability of man’s knowledge of the world is accounted for by God’s having made both to work together, Daniels accuses Reid of departing from philosophy for dogmatism. Similarly Alvin Plantinga’s presidential address to the American Philosophical Association, on “How to be an Antirealist” were met with a curled lip by philosophers of my acquaintance. Such philosophy will admit the field of philosophy of religion, and of inquiry into the existence and nature of God, but only when God is the subject of inquiry, not the explanation for the validity of the inquiry itself. Among Christians there have been different but equally flawed responses. One early form was the double-truth idea, that some things are true in philosophy (seen as science), while different things were true in theology, and these might well contradict. The approach returned in twentieth century in the distinction between the Bible as religiously true, but not scientifically or historically factual. Another response is to split the mind of man. Dooyeweerd considered man himself to be stretched across the supratemporal and the cosmic, and his reason only worked in the cosmic, while his religious self only knew intuitively. Van Tillians apply this division to knowledge, but without the theosophical explanation, but simply denouncing as rationalists those who do not accept it.